qaping.dev

New Science Demo

Your playtest? Log in

Recordings

Overall ?Rough (−0.8)Rough (−0.8) — −3 strongly disagree … +3 strongly agree11 ratings across 1 session
Enjoyment ?🙁 Not fun
Playtime33 minone recording · in-game time only; survey and notes not counted
Functional ?Visuals: +2.0 — The game looked and sounded great.Challenge: −2.0 — The level of difficulty felt just right.Controls: −1.0 — It was easy to figure out which buttons and keys did what.Goals: +1.0 — I always knew what my goals were in the game.Feedback: −1.0 — I got clear feedback on how I was doing.VisualsChallengeControlsGoalsFeedback
Psychosocial ?Autonomy: 0.0 — I had the freedom to choose how I played.Curiosity: −2.0 — I was curious to see more of the game.Immersion: −1.0 — I felt fully immersed in the game.Mastery: −1.0 — I felt like I was playing well.Meaning: −2.0 — Playing felt like time well spent.AutonomyCuriosityImmersionMasteryMeaning

Player experience — 11 constructs

← DISAGREEAGREE →-3Strongly disagree-2Disagree-1Slightly disagree0Neutral+1Slightly agree+2Agree+3Strongly agreeSession 1MEAN
FUNCTIONAL?
AUDIOVISUAL APPEALThe game looked and sounded great.Audiovisual appeal: mean +2.0session 1 — Audiovisual appeal: Agree (+2)+2.0CHALLENGEThe level of difficulty felt just right.Challenge: mean −2.0session 1 — Challenge: Disagree (-2)−2.0EASE OF CONTROLIt was easy to figure out which buttonsand keys did what.Ease of control: mean −1.0session 1 — Ease of control: Slightly disagree (-1)−1.0CLARITY OF GOALSI always knew what my goals were in thegame.Clarity of goals: mean +1.0session 1 — Clarity of goals: Slightly agree (+1)+1.0PROGRESS FEEDBACKI got clear feedback on how I was doing.Progress feedback: mean −1.0session 1 — Progress feedback: Slightly disagree (-1)−1.0
PSYCHOSOCIAL?
AUTONOMYI had the freedom to choose how Iplayed.Autonomy: mean 0.0session 1 — Autonomy: Neutral (0)0.0CURIOSITYI was curious to see more of the game.Curiosity: mean −2.0session 1 — Curiosity: Disagree (-2)−2.0IMMERSIONI felt fully immersed in the game.Immersion: mean −1.0session 1 — Immersion: Slightly disagree (-1)−1.0MASTERYI felt like I was playing well.Mastery: mean −1.0session 1 — Mastery: Slightly disagree (-1)−1.0MEANINGPlaying felt like time well spent.Meaning: mean −2.0session 1 — Meaning: Disagree (-2)−2.0
ENJOYMENT?
ENJOYMENTThe game was fun.Enjoyment: mean −2.0session 1 — Enjoyment: Disagree (-2)−2.0

Sessions

#AnsweredPlaytimeRatings ?
1Oct 12, 11:57 PM UTC33 minRough (−0.8) — −3 strongly disagree … +3 strongly agreeRough

Reviewer note

#Answer
1I really appreciated the presentation, art, and background music in the game—you can tell a lot of effort went into beautifying it [17:22, 18:00]. However, the core gameplay quickly started feeling tedious and repetitive [21:17, 31:18]. A lot of the card combinations felt like pure guesswork rather than having a clear underlying logic, which made progression feel reliant on luck [21:18, 31:00]. Moving from age to age felt like doing the same redundant tasks without meaningful progression [31:33, 31:54]. There were also a few UI pain points: no in-game settings/volume controls [0:22], unclear button and tag explanations on cards [1:44, 9:32], and no log or recipe history to remember which cards created an item [14:21].