I was surprised by how well it integrated and how easy it was to use. With a single prompt, the whole playtest process was executed end-to-end and the final result was a voice-over recorded video along with a summary, my favorite type of feedback!
Autonomous game testing
automate playtesting 🙋, find issues 🐛, and ship faster 🎮
01
Test design
Generate Playtest Cases with AI
AI generates the playtest cases, covering both functional QA and how the game feels to play.
QA-PLAN.md- Old saves load after the format changeFunctional QA
- Player can clear the tutorialFunctional QA
- Boss fight doesn't soft-lock on the phase-2 transitionFunctional QA
- Pause menu survives a key remapFunctional QA
- Does the new weapon feel powerful enough to be worth switching to?Feel
- Is the pacing dragging by the third act?Feel
- Does the reworked jump still feel responsive?Feel
02
Real people
Recruit playtesters on demand
We recruit vetted players to test your game and send back real human player insight — session notes, ratings, and quotes you can act on.
03
Findings
Detect Bug with AI
AI analyzes playtest footage and automatically detects and flags bugs, catching what human playtesters might have missed.
04
Automation
Automatically run tests
Every playtest session automatically turns into tests, and QAping automatically runs the full end-to-end suite — so it catches regressions and runs smoke tests on every change, without any extra setup.
failLocked door blocks progression
test_door_unlocks_on_keycard_pickupShip every change
with confidence
You changed five files. Any one of them could cause a regression — or worse, make the game unplayable. Normally that means replaying it yourself or rounding up playtesters. We make that simple and automatic, testing the edge cases you wouldn't think to check.
- Do old saves still load after the migration?
- Can a new player still clear the tutorial?
- Is the first boss still fun after the rebalance, or just hard?
- Does the settings screen survive a resolution change?
Tested by qaping
Case studies
What developers say after running qaping on their game.
Really easy to use and surprisingly useful. I especially like the dashboard: having the key stats and player behavior available instantly makes it much easier to understand what’s happening during a playtest and spot issues quickly.
Pricing
See pricing for solo developers, indie studios, and enterprise teams.
Free
Best for trying out qaping
$0/ month
- Free to start: enough for one 40-minute playtest with one player
- AI-written test plan from your changes
- Real human playtesters
- Video recording & survey
- AI video analysis
Indie
Best for solo devs and small teams
$50/ month
Everything in Free and:
- Up to 4 hours of playtesting a month
- About 24 QA checks a month
- Up to 3 players per round
- Sessions up to 2 hours long
- Verified fixes across rounds
Enterprise
Best for studios with a QA pipeline
Custom
Everything in Indie and:
- Custom playtest volume
- Invoiced billing
- Dedicated support
- Onboarding for your whole team